So far this has been one of the most intriguing classes I’ve taken in the two years I’ve been at UMass. From the local news, television shows, to films we can see how our media perpetuates the culture of fear in our society. I’ve always been rather skeptical about certain representations in the media, but as a white, middle class female certain things were just invisible to me. I think the readings and films we have viewed this year definitely have opened my eyes to the facts rather than the mask that politicians and media outlets parade in front of me. Overall the biggest lesson I’ve learned is that money sticks with money, and the rest can just eat cake.
One of the most interesting articles to me this year was Sharrett’s analysis of film in our neoconservative culture. No doubt it was definitely one of the most difficult reads, however it revealed so much about our culture’s economic system and the media representations used to keep it in place. One of my favorite points he made was how liberal rhetoric gets used to make people believe that are system accommodates to disparate groups in society, yet as he says the ‘neos’ just make our corrupt system follow a lawful course.
This has been one of the most challenging courses, but I feel I’ve learnt so much from the material and also my peers. I think the discussion helps a lot in expanding my thoughts because to really understand our culture is to garner multiple perspectives from diverse backgrounds. Some people mention things in class and I just think, wow I never would have seen it that way, but it makes so much sense. The culture of fear can be seen everywhere, and personally for me I see it in my parents the most. Perhaps when you have kids you begin to fear the world they will grow up in more than your own. I hope this class will ease my own exaggerated fears, as it has thus far, and allow me to concentrate on more important things like global warming and economic disparity.
Thursday, March 15, 2012
Sunday, March 11, 2012
Welcome to the Emerald City
After watching
the pilot episode of Oz and several
clips from other seasons I feel truly terrified of the prison system through
this lens. This hostile barbaric environment is filled with murderers, even
though statistically most prisoners are incarcerated for drug charges. To see
the real Wizard behind the curtain of the prison system watch the documentary, The War on Drugs: The Prison Industrial
Complex. This film enlightens
viewers on the reality of the penal system and the police force that drives
this “war,” as one scholar describes it as “the war on poor people.” The
American penal system is now driven by profit rather than rehabilitation, which
becomes detrimental to our society, specifically poor urban societies. Our
neoliberal capitalist society perpetuates a cycle of oppression and inequality
towards poor people of color and our corrupt legislation and media
representation mask this reality. People feed into this system because they
believe crime is rampant (yet Glassner tells us crime rates are decreasing)
which leads to stricter and longer sentences paid by American tax dollars. The
incarceration rate has grown exponentially and Americans understand this
shielded environment through media images of prisons and criminals.
The hit HBO
series Oz premiered in 1997 and ran
until 2003. Ironically the demographics of an HBO audience are mainly white and
wealthy, so basically opposite of prison demographics. Check this site out for
the numbers on HBO audiences: http://www.quantcast.com/hbo.com.
As Yousman mentions in his study of the
show, Inside Oz, that the viewers who
receive this representation of prison have no real life experience with either
going to prison or knowing someone who has gone. This becomes extremely dangerous
because their reality won’t be blurred by this image if they have no reality to
distort. People take this show as the truth and praise it for its authenticity,
but who are they to know what’s authentic about prison life? They believe since
HBO doesn’t need to censor their material that the writers aren’t holding back
the truth. This continues the discourse that men of color are violent criminals
that need to be locked up, and it’s all driven by one thing: money.
Media outlets
and politicians use rhetoric to scare us into thinking that our biggest problem
in this country is drug use, as Ronald Reagan put it “America’s crusade”
against drugs. I’m not condoning drug use but people are made to think poor
urban youth slip through the cracks of society because of drugs and spend all
our money to rehabilitate them in prison. From what I’ve seen in the Emerald
City’s prison is crime increases on the inside, so I guess rehabs out of the
question. We should be taking this money to rehabilitate positive social
organizations not the police. The police profit from drug charges and more
arrests which equals more money for them and less for the rest. They target poor communities, put these images in
front of a white audience and preserve our culture of fear. All that’s left is
to make a twisted hyperviolent prison show ironically headed by a black man to
show us that black men can succeed because it’s not our system’s fault if you
fail, it’s only the individual to blame.
Sunday, March 4, 2012
It isn't only a movie
In Adam Simon’s The
American Nightmare horror films from the 1960’s and 70’s are discussed in
their relation to sociopolitical struggles of the time. Right from the start
Simon does a brilliant job of cross cutting real life news media images and
fictional clips from horror films. The shots are so similar you can barely tell
what’s the news and what’s just a movie. The documentary includes interviews
with classic terrifying directors George Romero, Wes Craven, David Cronenberg,
John Carpenter, and other writers and scholars in the horror media field. If
anyone wants an insight on the relationship between societal fears and
fantastical horror films this documentary delivers.
The main theme addressed in Nightmare is society’s deep-rooted terrors unleashed on the big
screen, which gives us both a sense of pain and joy. I think an interesting
point they made was the fascination viewers have with wanting to go behind that
door to see the monster. The monster intrigues us because it is a human just
like us. So in this society do we become either victim or victor of the
American dream? One professor interviewed states that we teeter on a thin line
between pain and relief because pain is an inevitable part of the social
experience. The connection between society and body is unbreakable allowing us
to always find something relevant to our unconscious fears. Cronenberg believes
that you can’t get body without society and society without body. He made an
interesting point about society’s battle to repress our innate nature, and this
is where we find our struggle with pain and relief, with society and psychosis.
An interesting topic a couple of the directors brought up
was reintroducing our infantile fears. The idea of being eaten is a major fear
that we actually become familiarized with when we are just babies. Adults coo
over little babies nibbling at their toes saying, “oh you’re so cute I could just
eat you up.” They also reference the scene in Texas Chainsaw Massacre where they tease her to the point of tears
and then mock her cries. The directors pluck at the ingrained fears from our
childhood that we then relate to our current and much more broad struggles in
our contemporary life. It isn't only a movie when it shows reflections of our real life societal concerns, revealing something much deeper.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
